ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronCrossEye IconFacebook IconIcon FacebookGoogle Plus IconLayer 1InstagramCreated with Sketch.Linkedin IconIcon LinkedinShapeCreated with Sketch.Icon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailMenu BurgerIcon Opinion QuotePositive ArrowIcon PrintRSS IconIcon SearchSite TitleTitle ChevronTwitter IconIcon TwitterYoutube Icon
Asia300

Philippine antitrust watchdog approves SM bakeshop acquisition

Conglomerate promises not to harm rivals to Goldilocks Bakeshop in its malls

SM Investments purchase of the Goldilocks Bakeshop chain has raised concerns about the potential for unfair trading in its mall network.

MANILA -- SM Investments, the largest conglomerate in the Philippines, won regulatory approval on Tuesday for the acquisition of a local bakeshop chain after pledging to shun anti-competitive behavior. 

SM Retail's purchase of Goldilocks Bakeshop, a chain with over 500 outlets, took four months before securing Philippine Competition Commission (PCC) approval for the takeover -- a sign of tighter regulation of big business M&A activity. 

SM Retail is a sister company of SM Prime Holdings, the largest mall operator in the country. It leases space to many Goldilocks outlets as well as to competitors like Red Ribbon, a subsidiary of Jollibee Foods.

PCC said that among the competition issues raised during the review was the possibility of "total and partial foreclosure." Partial foreclosure refers to discriminatory behavior towards competitor tenants, such as less favorable locations or lease terms.

The PCC was also concerned that SM Group would have the opportunity to "share a competing mall tenant's business information to Goldilocks," because its malls operate a point-of-sale system that records the sales of its tenants.

SM last month pledged to protect the commercial information of Goldilock Bakeshop competitors and give them a "fair shake in their lease at all times."

PCC said SM Group is legally bound to honor its commitments, and that breaches could result in fines and other penalties. PCC inspectors will monitor compliance for five years.

Under the Philippine Competition Act enacted in 2015, PCC can check for anti-competitive and monopolistic practices that might arise from M&A activities when assets in excess of 1 billion pesos are involved.

The regulator has so far investigated alleged collusion among cement manufacturers and competition issues in the telecom industry, which is a duopoly. The tightening up has put it at odds with some big business groups used to operating unfettered and with impunity.

PCC Commissioner Stella Quimbo said last month that further reviews of the retail sector are likely "if another mall enters into a similar kind of transaction." 

Get unique insights on Asia, the most dynamic market in the world.

Offer ends September 30th

You have {{numberReadArticles}} FREE ARTICLE{{numberReadArticles-plural}} left this month

Subscribe to get unlimited access to all articles.

Get unlimited access
NAR site on phone, device, tablet

{{sentenceStarter}} {{numberReadArticles}} free article{{numberReadArticles-plural}} this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia; the most dynamic market in the world.

Benefit from in-depth journalism from trusted experts within Asia itself.

Try 3 months for $9

Offer ends September 30th

Your trial period has expired

You need a subscription to...

See all offers and subscribe

Your full access to the Nikkei Asian Review has expired

You need a subscription to:

See all offers
NAR on print phone, device, and tablet media