ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronCrossEye IconFacebook IconIcon FacebookGoogle Plus IconLayer 1InstagramCreated with Sketch.Linkedin IconIcon LinkedinShapeCreated with Sketch.Icon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailMenu BurgerIcon Opinion QuotePositive ArrowIcon PrintRSS IconIcon SearchSite TitleTitle ChevronTwitter IconIcon TwitterYoutube Icon

Philippine antitrust watchdog approves Grab-Uber merger

Conditions set to address 'virtual monopoly' in country's ride-hailing market

The Philippine Competition Commission accepted Grab's commitments to "competitive restraint" as part of its approval of the company's takeover of Uber's Southeast Asia business.

MANILA -- The Philippines' antitrust regulator on Friday approved Grab's takeover of Uber's Southeast Asian business, but imposed antimonopoly measures against the ride-hailing service provider.

The Philippine Competition Commission accepted Grab's commitments to "competitive restraint despite being a virtual monopolist."

Those commitments include restoring its cancellation rates to pre-merger levels, improving response time to complaints, providing a thorough breakdown on trip receipts and not requiring exclusivity from its driver pool.

This "balances business concerns and fair competition in the market," PCC Chairman Arsenio Balisacan said on Friday.

To avoid incurring penalties, Grab's fares should not involve an "extraordinary deviation" from minimum allowed fares, he added.

The commitments have been made to address PCC concerns over Grab having created a virtual monopoly in the ride-hailing sector, in which it can unilaterally raise prices and reduce service quality.

In March, Grab acquired Uber's entire Southeast Asia business in exchange for a 27.5% stake in its operations in the region. Uber had already ceased operating in the Philippines to comply with an order from the transport regulator following the expiration of its license.

The PCC's decision comes a month after its Singaporean counterpart concluded that the Uber-Grab merger had breached the city-state's antimonopoly regulations by "significantly lessening" competition in the ride-hailing market.

The authority proposed measures such as the maintenance of Grab's pre-merger pricing algorithm and driver commission rates. The commission also said it would request the merger be unwound if competition concerns remained. Grab later said it disagreed with the authority.

Nikkei staff writer Kentaro Iwamoto contributed to this story.

You have {{numberReadArticles}} FREE ARTICLE{{numberReadArticles-plural}} left this month

Subscribe to get unlimited access to all articles.

Get unlimited access
NAR site on phone, device, tablet

{{sentenceStarter}} {{numberReadArticles}} free article{{numberReadArticles-plural}} this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia; the most dynamic market in the world.

Benefit from in-depth journalism from trusted experts within Asia itself.

Try 3 months for $9

Offer ends September 30th

Your trial period has expired

You need a subscription to...

See all offers and subscribe

Your full access to the Nikkei Asian Review has expired

You need a subscription to:

See all offers
NAR on print phone, device, and tablet media