ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronTitle ChevronIcon FacebookIcon LinkedinIcon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailPositive ArrowIcon PrintIcon Twitter
International relations

First deadly India-China clash in 45 years: Five things to know

Modi warns Beijing of 'befitting reply' in Himalayas

NEW DELHI/BEIJING -- A tense military standoff between India and China over a disputed border in the western Himalayas took a dangerous turn this week when 20 Indian soldiers were killed in violent clashes.

On Wednesday, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said his country would defend every inch of its territory. "I would like to assure the nation that the sacrifice of our soldiers will not go in vain," Modi said. "India wants peace, but is capable of giving a befitting reply if instigated."

In a phone call on Wednesday with his Chinese counterpart, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar blamed China for the conflict, saying "the Chinese side sought to erect a structure" in an area in the Galwan valley that India considers its territory.

"The Chinese side took premeditated and planned action that was directly responsible for the resulting violence and casualties," Jaishankart told Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

The Chinese side issued a starkly different take.

Wang demanded that India carry out a thorough investigation into the border incident, Xinhua News Agency reported. He pressed Jaishankar to "severely punish those who should be held accountable, strictly discipline Indian frontline troops, and immediately stop all provocative actions so as to ensure that such incidents do not happen again," the report said.

Separately, the Chinese side called for dialogue to defuse the situation. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian told media: "Both sides agree to resolve this matter through dialogue and consultation and make efforts to ease the situation and safeguard peace and tranquillity in the border area."

New Delhi said China also suffered casualties in the incident late Monday at the Galwan Valley in eastern Ladakh, but Beijing has not revealed any figures. Local ANI news agency reported the Chinese side suffered 43 casualties, including dead and injured.

Both sides accused each other of unilateral action. No shots were fired during the incident, though stones and clubs were used.

A Reuters report citing Russian media said that a June 23 video conference between the foreign ministers of Russia, China and India had now been postponed. The ministers had planned to discuss a response to the coronavirus pandemic.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has warned of a "befitting" response to the clashes at the LAC while the Chinese side, led by President Xi Jinping, has called for dialogue to resolve the conflict. (Source photo by Reuters)  

What is the India-China border dispute about?

The two nuclear-armed countries have long been fractious neighbors and share a 3,500 km Line of Actual Control or LAC -- a border over which they fought a war in 1962.

China claims around 90,000 sq. kilometers extending across the northeastern state of Arunachal Pradesh. India, however, says that China is occupying 38,000 sq. kilometers of its territory in the Aksai Chin plateau.

There is no commonly agreed LAC between India and China. The countries have held 22 rounds of negotiations to resolve the boundary issue since 2003 with little to show.

Monday's clashes were the first fatal ones in over four decades. Experts said no shots have been fired along the disputed border since 1975. This is in part due to several signed agreements between the two since 1993 to refrain from the use of force to maintain peace.

"They have something called a banner drill," said N.C. Bipindra, founder and editor of defense and strategic news portal Defence.Capital. According to him, both sides will display banners to warn the other if they feel an infringement had been made.

"Sometimes, they push and shove and fisticuffs happen, but guns are always pointed to the ground if they carry them, usually [the guns are] behind their back with barrels facing the ground," Bipindra said.

What triggered the latest hostility?

The standoff began on May 5 when Indian and Chinese soldiers clashed at Pangong Tso, a lake 14,000 feet above sea level in Ladakh along the LAC. Troops engaged in fist fights and attacked each other with sticks and stones, leaving scores on both sides injured, India media reported. Over 1,000 Chinese soldiers were said to have entered Indian territory.

The hostility is believed to have been triggered by India laying a road in the region as part of infrastructure efforts. A few days after the May 5 clashes, similar outbreaks of violence occurred more than 1,000 km away in North Sikkim.

"This is infrastructure game as far as border areas are concerned," said Bipindra. "The Chinese have been at this game for a very long time but India sped up its infrastructure construction in the past few years," he said, adding that since Modi took power the Indians too "have been aggressively pushing infrastructure projects [and] that is certainly a cause of conflict as the Chinese didn't like it."

How has the international community reacted?

Eri Kaneko, associate spokesperson for the U.N. Secretary General, expressed concerns about the violence and deaths and urged both sides to exercise restraint.

The U.S. State Department, meanwhile, pointed out that India and China had expressed their desire to de-escalate, and that Washington supported a peaceful resolution.

How serious is the situation?

Both sides have said they are engaged in talks to de-escalate. However, experts remain concerned.

"It's a highly volatile and dangerous situation between two nationalistic, nuclear powers at a time when American influence has badly diminished," said Abraham Denmark, Asia program director at The Wilson Center.

Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy said fatalities at the LAC increased the chances of the standoff dragging into a "prolonged and unresolved situation."

What happens next?

Analysts noted that the two countries needed to quickly complete the de-escalation process they started on June 6.

"They should go back to their pre-May 1 positions and shouldn't interfere unnecessarily in each other's infrastructure work," Bipindra said. He added that it was not in China's interest to open a new front against another Asian giant, at a time when the world was viewing it as "a villain" due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Sponsored Content

About Sponsored Content This content was commissioned by Nikkei's Global Business Bureau.

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this monthThis is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia;
the most dynamic market in the world.

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia

Get trusted insights from experts within Asia itself.

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Try 1 month for $0.99

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this month

This is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia; the most
dynamic market in the world

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Try 3 months for $9

Offer ends October 31st

Your trial period has expired

You need a subscription to...

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers and subscribe

Your full access to Nikkei Asia has expired

You need a subscription to:

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers
NAR on print phone, device, and tablet media

Nikkei Asian Review, now known as Nikkei Asia, will be the voice of the Asian Century.

Celebrate our next chapter
Free access for everyone - Sep. 30

Find out more