ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronTitle ChevronEye IconIcon FacebookIcon LinkedinIcon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailMenu BurgerPositive ArrowIcon PrintIcon SearchSite TitleTitle ChevronIcon Twitter
Politics

Kunda Dixit: Giant neighbors and shifting plates put the squeeze on Nepal

Country must prepare to face natural disasters and political pressure

Sandwiched between two of the world's largest countries, Nepal has always described itself as a "small" country. But with a population of about 28 million, it is still around the world's 45th most populous nation. It is small only compared with China, to the north, and India, to the south, which together account for one-third of humanity.

It is also one of the most vertical countries in the world, rising from near sea level in the southern plains to the top of Mt. Everest at 8,848 meters, all within a distance of only 80km. Nepalis like to joke that there are six directions in their country: north, south, east, west, up and down. This makes the country very scenic -- and very seismic.

Nepal is the oldest nation state in South Asia and fought a war with British India 200 years ago to defend its independence. It also sent its army across the northern Himalayan border twice to invade Tibet in the 19th century, but the campaigns were not successful because the Chinese empire intervened to aid the Tibetans. Nepal has historically felt wedged in by its two giant neighbors -- the country's founding king said in 1760 that his new nation was like a "yam between two boulders."

To this day, most Nepalis still feel that their yam is being squeezed. The belief in Kathmandu that New Delhi micromanages Nepal's politics is probably exaggerated, but there has been a degree of meddling ever since British colonial days. Most recently, India is alleged to have blockaded the 1,300km open border between the two countries for five months in 2015, which decimated Nepal's economy and hampered the delivery of relief supplies after the devastating earthquake on April 25, 2015, which killed nearly 9,000 people. India says the blockade was imposed by Nepalese activists protesting a new constitution.

The country recently marked the second anniversary of the earthquake amid blistering criticism of the government by survivors, relief agencies and the international community for bungling the reconstruction process. Most of the 8 million people directly or indirectly affected are still living in temporary shelters, few of the 700,000 homes that were destroyed have been restored, and many families have tired of waiting for a promised $3,000 government reconstruction grant and are rebuilding on their own.

There are many reasons for the delay: a shortfall in international aid, government interference in relief efforts, duplication and wastage by international relief agencies, shortages of fuel and construction material due to the blockade and political instability caused by the dispute over the new constitution.

Within two months of the earthquake, the government conducted a damage assessment report that estimated that $9.38 billion would be needed to rebuild homes and infrastructure. A meeting of international donors in Kathmandu in July 2015 pledged $4.1 billion, more than half of it in loans from India and China. However, two years later only $2.73 billion has been received, with some donors having spent money directly through relief agencies and others failing to keep their promises.

BUREAUCRATIC BUNGLING Some donors have said the reason they have not provided the money pledged is because they do not trust the government to spend it in a timely and efficient manner. They have a point. The National Reconstruction Authority, an autonomous agency that is supposed to coordinate the aid effort, was set up eight months after the disaster. By the time it was fully staffed, its head had been sacked when the government changed. There has also been a breakdown in coordination between government ministries as well as between the government and the NRA.

Politicians have blatantly interfered in appointments to the NRA in the hope of either controlling the funds or taking credit for relief at election time. The upshot is a glaring lack of any sense of urgency in Kathmandu, even as survivors hunker down in tin huts to face their third monsoon in the mountains since the earthquake.

The only bright spot is that the former NRA chief executive, Govinda Pokhrel, a German-educated engineer, has been brought back into the NRA after his earlier sacking and is trying to make up for lost time by rushing to distribute the remaining housing grants and allowing families more flexibility in adapting seismic-resistant design elements into their new homes. The NRA itself has become a convenient lightning rod for politicians to cover up their own delays as Nepalis prepare to go to the polls for the first local elections in 20 years.

Nepal has been ruled by a series of political cartels since a civil conflict ended in 2006. Weak public grassroots pressure resulting from a lack of accountability at the local level led to the delay in aid relief in earthquake areas. The country is supposed to hold three elections in 2017, with the first one for village, town and district councils scheduled for May 14. A deadlock over provisions of federalism in the new constitution had made polls uncertain. However, a late-night breakthrough in negotiations on April 22 means that local polls will now be held in two phases -- in May and June.

Despite the death and destruction caused by the 2015 earthquake and the delay in relief efforts, it is clear the disaster could have been much worse. Since it struck on a Saturday, the lives of tens of thousands of children were probably saved since schools are normally housed in brick and clay buildings that quickly collapsed. The earthquake also only severely affected 11 of Nepal's 75 districts, according to some measures. Next time, however, Nepal may not be so lucky. Seismologists warn that the next "big one" could happen at any time since the accumulated tectonic stress below central Nepal has not been completely released.

There are few indications that Nepal's government or people have learned their lessons from the earthquake. Flimsy concrete apartment blocks are still going up in Kathmandu, while many of the houses in the countryside have been rebuilt using salvaged material and without any alteration in their design. More worryingly, there is almost no capacity to conduct search and rescue operations for those trapped in collapsed high-rises.

Besides enduring a geopolitical squeeze between India and China, Nepal will also need to maintain its preparedness for fresh geotectonic tension as the Indian plate continues to push up underneath China.

Kunda Dixit is the editor and publisher of the weekly Nepali Times newspaper in Kathmandu.

Sponsored Content

About Sponsored Content This content was commissioned by Nikkei's Global Business Bureau.

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this monthThis is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia;
the most dynamic market in the world.

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia

Get trusted insights from experts within Asia itself.

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Get Unlimited access

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this month

This is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia; the most
dynamic market in the world
.

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Try 3 months for $9

Offer ends June 30th

Your trial period has expired

You need a subscription to...

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers and subscribe

Your full access to the Nikkei Asian Review has expired

You need a subscription to:

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers
NAR on print phone, device, and tablet media