ArrowArtboardCreated with Sketch.Title ChevronTitle ChevronIcon FacebookIcon LinkedinIcon Mail ContactPath LayerIcon MailPositive ArrowIcon PrintIcon Twitter
Caixin

Does China plan an even tougher cryptocurrency crackdown?

Regulators warn of risk, sparking talk of stricter regulatory oversight

Bitcoin fell as much as 30% to $30,000 on May 19. Moves by financial regulators in China to tighten rules on cryptocurrencies added to the downward pressure.   © Reuters

Amid the ongoing cryptocurrency rout this week, a joint notice issued Tuesday by three Chinese financial self-regulatory bodies underscored the investment and legal risks involved with trading in virtual currencies, adding to downward pressure on prices.

The three industry organizations -- the National Internet Finance Association of China, the China Banking Association and the Payment & Clearing Association of China -- said a number of actions involving cryptocurrency trading are unlawful. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, fell as much as 30% to $30,000 Wednesday, hitting its lowest level since the beginning of February.

The joint statement also informed investors of risks associated with cryptocurrency transactions, including fictitious assets, business failures and speculation. China's judicial rulings confirm that contracts involving virtual currency transactions are not protected by law. That means investors have to bear losses caused by investments in virtual currencies.

The agencies' statement triggered market speculation on whether China will strengthen its supervision of virtual currencies. It made clear that trading in virtual currencies is a violation of relevant laws and regulations, including the exchange of legal currencies for cryptocurrencies and exchanges between different virtual currencies.

Xiao Sa, a legal expert, told Caixin that the most significant impact on the industry might be the exchange of legal currencies and cryptocurrencies. There is no lawful channel for virtual currency exchanges in China, indicating that exchanges' over-the-counter trading is the only approach for trading in digital currencies.

However, OTC transactions can be used for money laundering. Prudential countermeasures have been taken: OTC traders added requirements that buyers provide screenshots of their bank statements over the previous three days to prove that there had been no new transfers to accounts for 48 hours. Although efforts have been made to prevent money laundering, the illegality inherent in these exchanges cannot be hidden.

The joint announcement also warned institutions of the risk of violating laws and regulations when they deal in Bitcoin. By acting as information intermediaries and price-makers, carrying out initial coin offerings or trading in virtual currency derivatives, financial institutions are in violation of Chinese regulations. Such virtual currency-related businesses may also be involved in illegal fundraising, issuance of securities, selling of tokens and other criminal activities.

In reality, there have been a number of cases showing an absence of explicit regulations on virtual currency-related businesses for traditional financial and payment institutions. The statement issued this week bars certain practices, while demanding a strengthening of institutions' sense of social responsibility. They cannot, for example, use virtual currencies to price products and services, undertake virtual currency-related insurance services or include virtual currencies in insurance liabilities.

Institutions are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services directly or indirectly -- such as virtual currency registration, trading, clearing or settlement -- let alone issue virtual currency-related financial products.

The ban on indirect services will have significant implications, Xiao said. The regulation of virtual currencies is deep, covering almost all possible violations. It is also intended to prevent financial institutions from cooperating with unlicensed operations in offering virtual currency services. Even though financial institutions may not actively participate, the ban on indirect involvement creates compliance obligations that require financial institutions to actively screen currency-related services.

--

Read also the original story.

Caixinglobal.com is the English-language online news portal of Chinese financial and business news media group Caixin. Nikkei recently agreed with the company to exchange articles in English.

Sponsored Content

About Sponsored Content This content was commissioned by Nikkei's Global Business Bureau.

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this monthThis is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia;
the most dynamic market in the world.

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia

Get trusted insights from experts within Asia itself.

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Try 1 month for $0.99

You have {{numberArticlesLeft}} free article{{numberArticlesLeft-plural}} left this month

This is your last free article this month

Stay ahead with our exclusives on Asia; the most
dynamic market in the world
.

Get trusted insights from experts
within Asia itself.

Try 3 months for $9

Offer ends October 31st

Your trial period has expired

You need a subscription to...

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers and subscribe

Your full access to Nikkei Asia has expired

You need a subscription to:

  • Read all stories with unlimited access
  • Use our mobile and tablet apps
See all offers
NAR on print phone, device, and tablet media

Nikkei Asian Review, now known as Nikkei Asia, will be the voice of the Asian Century.

Celebrate our next chapter
Free access for everyone - Sep. 30

Find out more